Home / Michael Schratt

Michael Schratt

Aerospace Draftsman, UFO Researcher

Michael Schratt

Michael Schratt (military aerospace historian) has lectured across the country on the subject of “Mystery Aircraft”, and classified propulsion systems buried deep within the military industrial complex. A recent guest speaker at the “OSHKOSH” AirVenture 2006/2007 event, (the world’s largest air show), Michael has developed a number of contacts who have had first hand experience dealing with classified “black programs”, including former USAF pilots, retired Naval personnel and aerospace engineers who have maintained a TOP SECRET Q “MAJIC” clearance. A private pilot and military aerospace historian, he currently works as an aerospace draftsman/researcher. Michael is a former writer for Open Minds UFO magazine


Read UFO news and stories by Michael Schratt.

Watch or listen to archived episodes of Michael Schratt on Open Minds Radio.

Open Minds UFO Video Portal

5 comments

  1. avatar

    Resently I saw in youtube your conference in advance aircrafth and ufo, the next quotations are only my very personal point of view on your conference , it,s seems to me (quite clever ) that when you were speaking about triangular shape craft you said that could be 1 of ours . Those like triangular or rectangular huge aircraft were suppose to be american man made or that could be like that . Those who were silent craft with super sonic movements . All of a sudent manipulation word jump to my mind…those high tech were from here and those who expel fire were from outside this world …hummm . Tell me could be that you kind of work for U.S.A secret goverment and were comisioned to divert everybody way of thinking to look other side and make everyone think that the high tech craft are from us. and the others from outer space , just to keep hiding the real truth . Come on everybody knows that AMERICANS DON,T has that kind of technology .they still using chemicals as ways of propulsion . Clever mr Schratt quite clever. lucky you I did,nt post this letter in youtube…not yet .

  2. avatar

    Javier you’re and idiot!

  3. avatar

    Jason, your insightful analysis of Javier’s comment was so deep. Did you actually think before typing? If not, let me suggest a little more thought, because I am sure you want to be perceived as an intelligent person, and not a Californian. As a Californian myself, I should be deeply offended by my remark, but you see, I am able to read the irony in my statement (and it’s politically correct to dis’ oneself, biatch!).. 😉

    Javier, that is an interesting perspective, but I am sure Mr. Schratt either misspoke, or you misheard it, because Mr. Schratt has to be intelligent enough to know the difference between an explosive combustion/ propulsion system and an anti-gravity drive.

    Finally, Michael, I think your work is excellent – please, more! I sent you a note on LinkedIn (I hope you reply – I have some hearsay ‘evidence’ – friend of mine who knows some Groom Lake guys). Also, it seems to me there IS some disinformation re: the TR-3B / Aurora / Alien, Other Craft. They seem to sort of merge into one another, depending on the speaker & the audience, but I would surmise the following:

    1. TR-3B – Black Equilateral triangle body, with reddish-white lights at each corner, and a spherical orb (sometimes red, sometimes white) in the center. Likely American-made, possibly an ARV (or anti-grav propulsion stolen from some inventor like Hutchinson, or Tesla patent?)

    2. Aurora – I know this is a Military black project of a modified Scramjet / Hypersonic aircraft, up to 10,000 mph+ (using NASP/ X-30 technology – flying since the late 80’s). Interestingly, this craft is shaped like an isosceles triangle. So then is the Aurora an ARV, based on the so-called ‘licorice drop’?

    3. Black Pyramid – This probably evolved from the F117 Stealth Fighter (because it looks the most ‘black pyramid-y’ to me ;-). Could this be an ARV? Or American-made using alien design concepts.
    * Note, WIKI-P can’t distinguish a triangle from a pyramid (that third dimension is a biatch!), and consider the TR-3B triangle as a pyramid. They say a black triangle landed at Rendelsham, and if so, then whoopee, the Brits got to see a Stealth Fighter while still being classified secret. Now I like the Rendelsham UFO witnesses, and maybe they “did see a puddy tat”, but I happen to know personally how much the Brits like their drink & psychedelic drugs (even more than their American counterparts, and we all know how high fliers often get!!), so I have difficulty believing this was anything than a secret US stealth fighter.

    4. Alien Triangular Design – The Phoenix Lights – OK, there’s one black triangle (ostensibly a TR-3B??); wait, no, there’s multiple triangular craft; oh, darn, there’s one HUGE Black V. Are the lights from separate triangle ships that have joined into one large ‘V’ (a ‘culmination’ of craft into a ‘Gestalt’, like in the film “Battle: Los Angeles” with Aaron Eckhardt – their aliens – clearly non-human! – had ships made up of multiple unoccupied drones)? Could be Alien (or would that be ‘Extra-terrestrial?)

    Honestly, this distinction is only marginally relevant, and highly confusing. If things really are THAT strange – that we have non-human Aliens visiting us, as well as Future-Humans’ – and what of the Past-Humans, who seeded Homo Sapiens? With the diverging timeline issue, if a Future-human ‘extra-terrestrial’ goes back in time to genetically alter his ancestor, that would then propagate a new timepath, to where ‘he’ wouldn’t exist in the future, his modified self would. When he returns to his present, it is no longer his previous present, but a new present (with the modified ‘him’ in it, simultaneously with the ‘old him’. The legal ramifications are mind-boggling!). Would the future of this new timepath (created by going back), how would he even be able to return to this new ‘future’ (present) if it had not been lived yet? Perhaps this limits the future time duration from the point in time one travels back to, plus the length of time one actually lives there – in essence, once you go back in time, you NEVER come back (that’s the marketing slogan: “Escape your life today – it’s rotten! Creditors, old scores, ex-wives –FORGOTTEN! Relax and let go all your sorrow; Go on back to yesterday, tomorrow.”

    Perhaps there are some kind of “Quantum Spacetime settling”, with Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle effects, that annihilates the ‘old’ reality in favor of the new reality, preventing one’s return to their former spacetime reality forever (now THAT is scary!). This makes sense, as now going backwards in time is really a one-way trip; just bending back a new timepath into a new future. But I digress…

    5. The Orion P52 – I couldn’t find any info on this on the web, aside for references with Dan Burisch and J-Rod, so if anyone has details, please add them in. From Burisch, it sounds like this is similar to Adamski’s flying saucer, which seems just like Bob Lazar’s ‘Sport Model’ saucer, from the description of the three gravity amplifiers. These examples are some of the best corroborating evidence of the physical craft, because I do not believe Adamski’s ufo films were faked. Then, from his descriptions of the long cigar-shaped mother ship, which match up with current video footage, starts to make a coherent picture of these creature’s transportation systems.

    6. What about Meier’s Beam Ship’s? Curiously, Billy Meier’s Pleaidean ‘beam ships’ (the ‘Wedding cake’ version) have not been seen by others that I can tell; also, has Meier been debunked, or not? I thought I read he admitted to hoaxing his shots, then no? This kind of case is all too common in Ufology, and has kept me from believing any of it for years. Because of this, I would say it must be a part of the overall debunking plan, as it has been quite effective.

    7. Finally, there are the ‘Lifeform Balloon’ shapes that seem to float like balloons, and morph about, much like ‘Transformers’ robots (and the drone culminations noted earlier); These sometimes look like a floating air creature, and I wonder if they could be some natural terrestrial (or extra -) flora or fauna, such as a gas dragon, or puffer fish without water! These also might be CGI renderings. Does anyone else have a theory?

    Note: Re: acronyms, we should likewise stop using UFO for many sightings, because we are now identifying these craft. They should be classified as above, or as IOUO for “Identified Object, Unknown Origin”, or something similar – even ‘IFO’ when we have identified the ship as ‘saucer’, ‘disk’, ‘triangle’ or ‘sphere’ (the Orbs are likely unoccupied reconnaissance drones made up of a formed energy ; ‘TR-3B’ or ‘Aurora’, ‘P52 Orion’, etc);

    This is a fascinating phenomenon, and should it all prove to be a hoax, then it’s the most compelling psycho-sociological syndrome in history. Hmm, maybe the J-Rod (Grey) IS infected with human dementia? If this is an actual phenomenon, then everyone involved should work towards full disclosure, as this is the most important story in human history.

    Warren Scott Fentress

  4. avatar

    Michael Schratt is one of the hardest working men in Black Ops ,UFO business. You may not agree with all of his conclusions, but you will always learn something new.

  5. avatar

    Re: BEN RICH – “THERE IS AN ERROR IN THE EQUATIONS…”

    Hi Michael. First of all thanks for your excellent presentations. I watched your Black Budget aircraft one from youtube with my parents and even my Dad who’s often a VERY hard nosed ‘skeptic’ was very impressed by it, that in my mind says a lot about the professional way you obviously researched and presented it!

    You were quoting Ben Rich saying that “There is an error in the equations but now we’ve figured it out.”:

    I believe Rich may very well have been referring to Einstein’s ‘Lightspeed theory’. It certainly makes sense. According to Einstein’s theory “nothing can travel faster than the speed of light”, thus totally limiting space travel over long distances. Lightspeed theory only applies to LINEAR space travel. It totally relies on the perceived limitations of conventional physics for light speed theory to be correct.

    If they ‘figured that out’ (light speed theory and linear travel over distance being wrong) then that would have TOTALLY changed what is possible in terms of one distance space travel thus giving them the ability to ‘travel to the stars’.

    Keep up the great work!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*