Comments on: Alien Autopsy Part I: The Shroud of Ufology

By: Kim

Kim — Mon, 01 Nov 2010 21:09:10 +0000

Are you ever going to show the footage?

By: burt

burt — Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:15:03 +0000

hallo waar kan ik het wrak ..film vinden? van santilli.? en de orginale kleuren film doco,vaneen duits offisiers dochter.die de mooi foto van de aliën had gemaakt?vr gr burt

By: Maurizio Baiata

Maurizio Baiata — Mon, 17 May 2010 19:31:35 +0000

The Alien Autopsy Footage(or Santilli Footage) officially released is composed by two elements:
- The Second Autopsy film
- The Wreckage film

In both cases Santilli recently claimed that these films came out of a restoration work on some original frames.
The First Autopsy was never release. The alleged on site scene footage (with Truman and the crashed disc) was never shown. Plus, we have the 18 seconds segment inserted at the end of the “Alien Autopsy” 2006 theatrical film.
As UFO researchers, we study this matter, but we are not the owners of any image, nor we claim that it the film was damaged or either. That’s a Santilli’s statement. I know Ray is following this thread, but I bet he will never give us the pleasure of any further detail.
Maurizio Baiata

By: boog

boog — Mon, 17 May 2010 09:13:35 +0000

cool

By: Brandon A. Poindexter

Brandon A. Poindexter — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:27:03 +0000

I meam, I know we’re not alone out her but if you guyes SAY that you have the footage, then you say that it’s damaged…. WTF i don’t get it

By: Mark Center

Mark Center — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:27:42 +0000

Of course, what Philip mantle is stating here is right. My point was IF there was all this material available to back up any of the claims that Santilli has made regarding his video, he would have released SOMETHING, ANYTHING of substance. He didn’t, he hasn’t and he can’t. Because, 1947, 16 mm film with a creature on it, and dated to 1947 does not exist. Nor does the cameraman, a crash site or anything else. Again, if you don’t think so, do some home work and prove us wrong. Show the world a verified crash site, film stock or cameraman and we’ll gladly job on board and beat the drum… “It’s real, it’s real…”

By: philip Mantle

philip Mantle — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:13:56 +0000

The alien autopsy film does not have a military record either. All it has is claims from Santilli that cannot be backed up with any real evidence. Santilli has not provided anything that can support his claims. However, there are a number of people including Keith Bateman (the man who faked the tent footage) and Spyros Melaris (the man who led the team that faked the autopsy and debris footage) that can provide supporting evidence to support their claims. Try as you like Maurizio the film is a complete hoax and Santilli is still telling porkies about it.

Regards,

Philip.

By: Mark Center

Mark Center — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:53:10 +0000

>>> I asked him about the Truman clip. “Yes, it’s in there, but it has been damaged, and I doubt we can make up for it.” <<<

Any proof of this footage? Let's a remember, Santilli told the world that the Truman footage was so clear you could read Truman's lips while you watched the footage.

He also stated that they had crash site footage with the craft, the Army equipment, etc.

I say bullshit. Prove me and Philip Mantle assertions wrong.

By: Mark Center

Mark Center — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:48:56 +0000

>>> Again I said to him that I was not buying his story without any physical evidence. And he responded adamantly, “Maurizio, this footage will be the Shroud of Ufology. You will never solve the enigma of its authenticity, never.” It was sort of a curse, and today we can say that Santilli was right. <<<

What a joke. The Shroud of Turin doesn’t have a military record, a home with photos and memorabilia to prove the pedigree of the material and the person whom supposedly took the footage, a wife and kids to back up their fathers claims, the Elvis footage Santilli supposedly bought from this man (where is this footage?), the plane tickets, passport, taxes paid which would be associated with the trip, etc, and other corroborating evidence Santilli says he still has…

And, the Autopsy was supposedly shot in 1947, not AD 1260-1390 one of the given dates for the shroud… Give me a break. What a joke.