Home / Articles / Response to Hawking on alien agenda
...something in the world is changing and is forcing some authoritative luminaries of our scientific firmament to pay closer attention to that scenario which they still do not want to depict as anything more than a valid hypothesis.

Response to Hawking on alien agenda

Is the only thing to be feared fear itself?

“…In any event, it is more plausible that the United States (would) be invaded, rather than by troops from the Axis, by the denizens, not well known, but it seems rather warlike, of the planet Mars, who shall come down from sidereal space on unimaginable flying fortresses”.

– Benito Mussolini, Teatro Adriano, Rome (speech to Fascist Trade Unions), February 23rd 1941.

“I can assure you that flying saucers, given that they exist, are not constructed by any power on this Earth”

– President Harry Truman, press conference at the White House, April 4th 1950

“You now face a new world…We speak in strange terms: of harnessing the cosmic energy…of ultimate conflict between a united human race and the sinister forces of some other planetary galaxy”.

– General Douglas MacArthur, Address to the US Military Academy, West Point, May 12th 1962

Stephen Hawking

Stephen Hawking

The intense debate triggered by Professor Stephen Hawking’s warning against the dangers he predicts in the event of mankind coming into contact with advanced Extraterrestrial life forms reveals that such an event is now accepted by many  as more than a remote theoretical possibility.

Scientists of Hawking’s eminence have, with rare exceptions, tended to dismiss the mere suggestion that life forms equal or superior to our species could visit us – or be found within the radius of space that is accessible to our space missions – as a fantasy only acceptable in science fiction. Yet, something in the world is changing and is forcing some authoritative luminaries of our scientific firmament to pay closer attention to that scenario which they still do not want to depict as anything more than a valid hypothesis.

In negotiations regarding matters of sensitive military technology, hypothesis is often resorted to as a diplomatic stratagem to refer to “unacknowledged” or clandestine realities without requiring the other side to admit to their existence. Thus, we could say: “let us assume, for the sake of argument, that you had a secret weapon with such and such capabilities; how could we then handle that threat, if it ever were there, in order to remove suspicions as to your intentions?”.

A similar approach is often adopted in official circles regarding the Extra-terrestrial issue, since it has long gone without saying that “serious, responsible” people don’t believe in UFOs and related subjects and adhere faithfully to the current secular theology which affirms mankind’s supremacy, at least in our solar system if not in this extended neighbourhood of the Milky Way. The establishment has gratefully taken Fermi’s question: “where are they?” as a conclusion: “Thank God, they are nowhere to be seen” and are quite unwilling to move off this metaphysical dime.

Physicist Enrico Fermi

Physicist Enrico Fermi

The very use of the verb “believe” in the “ET business” is revealing since it reduces all positive opinions as to the reality of UFOS or other non-human advanced life forms and organizations from “out there” to an issue of religious faith which, by definition, needs no proof or reasoning to be held. Any amount of credible testimonies, documented reports corroborated by multiple witnesses and by trustworthy technical tools such as high definition binoculars, radars, sonars, theodolites, magnetometers, photographs, film and the like is dismissed or ignored with a disdain evocative of Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s superb admonition: “let us ignore the facts, they have nothing to do with the matter”.

Indeed, material evidence that seems to contradict revered scientific theories is treated with the familiar “not-invented-here” stiff upper lip, including the many photographs taken from our space probes that give hints of the existence of artificial structures and crafts on the Moon and on Mars.

It is an understandable but sad feature of the human mind in general that it much prefers the theories and explanations it begets than the unfamiliar and unexplained happenings that often brutally impact its carefully wrought certainties. Thus many scientists are proud to admit that, like doubting Thomas, they don’t believe their eyes or ears, but unlike him, they won’t be convinced either by touching “hard” evidence that does not fit into the models which they trust such Hawking’s theories about the origin and ultimate fate of the universe. These theories are rooted in “gedanken” experiments, ultimately unprovable and probably devoid of practical use but they nonetheless are greeted with the reverence traditionally shown for divine messages while well documented apparitions of UFOs before many witnesses are shunted aside as if they were suspect and irrelevant mind tricks.

Even highly credible and authoritative personalities, such as NASA astronaut Dr, Edgar Mitchell, ex-Defence Minister of Canada Paul Hellyer, Nobel Prize winning scientist Cary Mullis, the wife of the current Japanese Prime Minister or the late Establishment icon Laurance Rockefeller are disregarded when they affirm the evidence of an Extraterrestrial presence and their convictions are automatically downgraded to the familiar level of “belief” as if they has embraced some bizarre minority cult.

More prudent members of the global elite will concede that they are very interested in the UFO issue but will carefully add that they don’t believe that they are “extra-terrestrial”, even when they have no other explanation to account for their existence. Yet, back on January 28th 1920, the Daily Mirror and other newspapers published Guglielmo Marconi’s declarations about the seemingly intelligent radio messages that were being received from outer space in various locations simultaneously, including New York and London. They reported that he thought those messages might have come from civilizations living on other planets. However, the official “scientific” verdict today is that no “artificial” signal has ever been picked up from outside our planet.

Guglielmo Marconi with his equipment.

Guglielmo Marconi with his equipment.

Against such an attitude which raises skepticism to the degree of negationism, the kind of proof that students of ufology and exopolitics have garnered for well over a century is insufficient since, even the most irrefutable records are held at bay as being at best unexplained anomalies that might be accounted for one day through some unfathomed conspiracy theory. The shoe is then on the other foot because the much-decried “Exopoliticians”  admit that there is a meta-human, extra or supra-terrestrial intelligence agency at work and are willing to take the facts at face value while the orthodox scientists tend to take refuge in a paranoid suspicion that some government-inspired plot  might manifest the “Deus ex machina” of flying saucers and other UFOs and even use midgets or computer-generated special effects to lead naïve citizens into extraterrestrial superstitions, probably so as to better control them.

Yet, that attempt to discount the hard and multiple UFO evidence is unsatisfying to exacting scientists of Hawking’s level and they, sooner or later, must confront the facts, however intellectually uncomfortable those may appear. The next stage is then to admit that there may well be ETs somewhere but with the caveat that mankind should try to stay clear of them because they could be very dangerous for our collective freedom or even our survival. This is precisely what Hawking does. On the face of it, his warning is logically compelling. However, the obviousness of his conclusions makes them almost inane because if ETs are so much more powerful than us and can somehow get here, then our attempt to stay away or ignore them would be futile as the outcome of this contact would not depend on us. On the other hand, if we discover a new living species that lies below our level of evolution, then it is unlikely we would stay away either, given that we have not done so with any of the millions of plants and animals that populate our own planet.

Inevitably Hawking has to use the language of speculative hypothesis in order to allude to some of the hard evidence that has been gathered for so many years. He specifically says: “I imagine (is that a euphemism for “I am aware”?) they (ETs) might exist in massive ships, having used up all the resources for their home planet, such advanced aliens  would perhaps have become nomads, looking to conquer and colonize whatever planets they can reach”.

As astrophysicist Neil Degrasse Tyson pointed out in an interview with Dr. Sanjay Gupta on CNN on 27th of April 2010, Hawking’s depiction of the methods and motivations of the Aliens, based on the many observations of “massive ships” reflects the fear they may think and act as most humans have tended to through history and also the suspicion that they have already done to their original planets the fatal damage that we are inflicting on our own. What part is certain knowledge and what part is speculation? The parallel with Columbus and the Conquistadors and colonizers of the last five centuries comes to mind but let us not forget that there is an alternative philosophy. As against the predatory politics of “dog eats dog” that contemporary social theories generally regard as a fundamental instinct, the spiritual and social systems of India and other ancient lands have proclaimed for millennia that human upliftment is only possible through the shedding of the fear that makes us confuse a rope with a snake, according to the well known aphorism of the Upanishads.

Astrophysicist Neil Degrasse Tyson

Astrophysicist Neil Degrasse Tyson

The fear of the unknown makes us want to close our door and at the same time prepare to fight and kill whatever it is that may come from the mysterious outside. Aggression is thereby nurtured and turns against all those whom we perceive as different; in return it generates as a mirror image aggression from the other. Given the fact that the manifested Alien presence has not hitherto harmed us in any visible way and has not attempted to conquer us, should we not shed the fear and open our minds, eyes and arms to the undivided, unified universal field and all its denizens?

Popular Posts:

Open Minds UFO Video Portal

About Come Carpentier

avatar
COME CARPENTIER DE GOURDON is currently the Convener of the Editorial Board of the WORLD AFFAIRS JOURNAL, a quarterly publication dedicated to international issues, sponsored by the Kapur Surya Foundation (a co-sponsor of the “World Public Forum for Dialogue of Civilisations”) New Delhi, India. For more information about Come, visit: www.ComeCarpentier.com. He shares his time between India, France, Italy and Switzerland. He has lived and traveled in more than fifty countries on four continents. He is also a consultant to Indfos Industries Ltd, a company founded and chaired by the well known Indian philosopher, futurologist and engineer J.C. Kapur, and continues to provide consulting services to various other companies in India and Europe.

10 comments

  1. avatar

    This is an article of interest that makes some very good points and draws a distict line between religion and science. I enjoyed it, but still am asking some questions which make me a sceptic. Surely someone in the Roswell area, or near any other reported UFO accident, has spirited away some small piece of material from one of these UFOs. Where is it? Yes, the army put fear in the hearts of many, but somewhere there should be some bit of evidence in the hands of a citizen. Why not put out a call to persons with evidence to come forward, to to MUFON or perhaps Open Minds and not the government.

    I would also like to make the point that we, as the citizens of earth, can take the heat of the government lifting the veil on the truth. It is time.

  2. avatar

    I have been blessed with the knowledge of “they are real” for a lifetime and have never found it necessary to prove the point.It doesn’t take a scientist to do the research and if they can’t find a cure for cancer what makes one think they can “find the proof” of extraterrestrial visitation?Read some books. Try Delores Cannon’s books. Go to the UFO Congress, hear from the ones who know with credentials enough to choke a horse. Fear causes confusion. Can you imagine the head shaking that goes on at our stunted evolution? Is it fearful to think that Creator of 500 million/billion universes can do whatever?Personally.. I yield, I can barely take care of my own backyard. Good luck to everyone, see you on another planet? when we are finished ruining this one.

  3. avatar
    William Wheaton

    After all the wars that have been waged on this earth over the centuries I should not fear an alien presence but the ultimate thermonuclear human conflict which will result in our extinction. Don’t think for moment that over time our conflicts haven’t been observed and measured by highly evolved beings.

  4. avatar

    I wonder, as an experiment, instead of trying to contact something across the Universe we could turn to our own planet and try to contact what’s flying in our skies. No better time than now with our hopeless case of the oil-soaked Gulf environment. Do you think there’s a chance they would help us out? You’ll never know till you ask. Let’s open the door to some dialog.

  5. avatar

    HAWKING IS LIKLEY GIVING ‘PAY BACK’ TO HIS YEARS OF ‘GRANT’ MASTERS,SOME WHO ARE IN THE BUSINESS OF MIS-INFORMATION.
    HAWKING HAS NEVER ACTUALLY TALKED, REGRESSED HYPNOTICLY, TO (HAS-HE?) HUNDREDS OF ABDUCTION VICTIMS,LIKE BUD HOPKINS DOES,SO HE IS IN NO POSITION TO’EVALUATE’…SUCH A NEGATIVE ‘WARNING’.
    THERE ARE SO MANY MILLIONS OF US,WHO HAVE HAD ACTUAL EXPERIENCES WHICH TELLS US THAT HAWKING IS ILL-INFORMED AND FOR HIM TO MAKE SUCH STATMENTS WITHOUT COMMUNICATING WITH ABDUCTION VICTIMS,SAYS VOLUMES ABOUT HAWKING ON THE SIDE OF SECRET GOVERNMENT AND BIAS.
    EBE ENITIES CAN BE BOTH: GOOD OR BAD,BUT THE GOOD ONES ARE HERE TO PROTECT EARTH AND IT’S PEOPLE.THAT (i) KNOW.

  6. avatar

    There is one correlation that has not been touched upon. The fact that Time it self is “Subjective” at best. You have to scale in the fact,… that it was created by man to govern his biological clock. Math as we conceive may not be the universal leveling stick. Slamming objects no matter how small into each other is “DISTRUCTIVE” and shows no true relevance to where we truely are today in the grand scheme of the universe. If I were watching from afar I would keep my distance just for a few of these facts! Kids playing with matches!!! Our first act as a race should be HOW THE HECK DO WE GET OFF THIS VIOLENT ROCK! (

  7. avatar

    Obviously, Hawkings is being paid by the “secret government” to spread fear. They picked him because of his supposed (perceived) intelligence. I agree, he is now answering to HIS masters.

    ET’s are real. They are our benefactors. They would have taken us over a long, long time ago if they were so inclined.

    They have every right to protect “space/time” from the Rothchild’s, Rockefellers, and their “masters” who would enslave the remaining humans after Project Endgame.

    I’d be happy to join them and leave this screwed up planet, so long as I can bring my dog.

  8. avatar

    There are many aggressive acts on ET’s part. According to Budd Hopkins, and Dr. David Jacobs, possibly as many as 6 million a year, in the United States alone.

    Being forcibly taken from your house, car, etc and being subjected to experimentation, much of which is extremely painful, and may also cause irreparable damage, both physically and mentally, is an act of WAR!!!

    Just because, most of what is occurring, is to painful for most abductees’ to acknowledge, and the ones who do, are assaulted, buy a society, to frightened, to consider the truth.

    Doesn’t mean they aren’t taking an aggressive and hostile, posture! Unfortunately, it is quite possible that, THE REAL TRUTH, IS MORE, THEN OUR WORLD CAN ENDURE!

    Maybe we should ask Todd See, and Jonathon Lovette if Mr. Hawking has a point!!!!

  9. avatar

    I would like to help every one here. Under stand what is really happening. In the beginning a war in heaven, … most know the story. God tossed a very powerful being out of heaven with his cohorts, the fallen ones. These beings were gifted with high abilities from God. The disagreement was manifold but primarily over the perversion of the beings, The “watchers” . These beings were watching us, you might say they were our baby sitters. Now as the babies grew up the watchers became illicit in their intent toward us the children.. In fact not only was their intention moving toward harming the children, they were developing a desire to mate with us. Something not allowed by God.. In fact it was stickily forbidden.
    The watchers decided they would give up their eternal abode and descend to earth, to take what & whom they wanted. So in other words the baby sitters were molesting the children. The sad part is the children weren’t exactly innocent, as they were endowed with enough instruction and wisdom to know better. So the consequence was eternal damnation for the watchers and a slim second chance for the children, Being they had less culpability in the matter.
    However the children had now become contaminated, or in clearer terms molested, damaged goods. An adornment had to be paid, Enter in the Savior, You all know him as Jesus. But the Disobedient beings the watchers were not conceding so easily.

    These watchers are aliens.

  10. avatar

    Wake-up call here
    I respect Stephen Hawking……he is one of our foremost current living astrophysicist or cosmologist. But when it comes to extraterrestial aliens, he is way off the mark.
    He, of all people, understanding the complexities of the mechanics of our Universe, must believe in a Univerval Consciousness,call it God if you wish. I do.
    At this time, our current telescopes can only see as far back as 15 billions years, to the time we believe is the origin of our Universe. Our Universe could be 50, 100, 500 billions years old.nobody knows for sure.
    In any event even at 15 billion years young, would you not think that that our Universe, with billions of Galaxies, certainly would have sentient civilizations with far more advance technology than ours, including far off space travel.
    Would you not think that our Universal Consciousness, or our Creator, God if you wish, in Its/His Infinite Wisdom would have seen to it that in our corner of the Universe:
    1) The advance species that can reach us would:
    a) for now watch us and not bother to even contact us because we are so warlike, and not want to have anything to do with us until we evolve to a higher level of being or consciousness so as to be worthy of becoming part of the so called ” Galactic Federatrion”
    b) For the more benevolent aliens to have a very limited contact with us for now to try and help Humanity overcome our current political disfunctions and environmental/ecological dfisasters to avoid our own ultimate extinction!
    c) that Our Universal Consciousness/Creator/God would see to it that the aliens who would have the tecnhology to conquer and destroy us are so far away in distant Galaxies that they can never, ever reach us, no matter how advanced their space travel technology is?
    Think about this for a moment.
    All the signs are here that Earth has been visited by extraterrestials from the dawn of time itself.
    Stephen, don’t you think that your so-called conquering/ invading aliens would have been here by now and conquered/estroyed Humnaity into oblivion!

    Wake up Stephen and believe in our Ctreator!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*